Bartz, a Republican who served in the Legislature for 12 years before taking federal jobs in Washington, is running against Democrat Doug Thompson of Kanawha in Senate District 6.
Bartz said Thompson’s direct-mail advertising “comes as close to character assassination as I’ve ever experienced.”
“I realize I’m not everyone’s soup du jour but I’m flabbergasted by some of the things being said about me,” he said.
Thompson said he stands behind everything in his ads. “I don’t want to minimize Merlin’s concerns,” said Thompson. “It’s just hard for him to walk away from his record.”
Bartz said one of the ads claims that in 1997, when he was a member of the House, he voted against making medications more affordable to senior citizens. The ad cites House File 715.
That file does not mention medications for senior citizens, said Bartz. It does include increasing child day care assistance, increasing child-support recovery money, increasing reimbursements to nursing homes, providing training assistance for families going off of welfare and an increase in subsidies for families adopting children.
Legislative records show that the House passed the bill 90-7 on May 21, 1997, indicating large bipartisan support for it.
Bartz said he doesn’t know how the Thompson campaign determined that he voted against medications for seniors in that bill.
“The only thing I can figure is I think there was an amendment that included Viagra as one of the medications that would be covered. We didn’t think taxpayers would want to pay for Viagra. I voted against it and so did a lot of other people,” he said.
Another Thompson ad claims Bartz is opposed to a children’s health insurance program as well as increases in Medicare and Medicaid. It cites a Project Vote-Smart survey that Bartz filled out this year.
Project Vote-Smart is an independent organization that provides information on political candidates throughout the country.
The survey includes questions in which candidates are to indicate priorities from lengthy lists.
It stipulates that not marking a particular item does not indicate a lack of interest.
Bartz marked “limiting amount of damages in malpractice lawsuits” but did not mark anything else
The Thompson campaign used this as the basis for the ad in question.
Thompson said, “We went by what he marked and by what he didn’t mark. That’s the record.”
The Vote-Smart survey states candidates are not to use its name or programs in any campaign activity.
Thompson said, “I understand Merlin’s complaints and I want to say that I like Merlin personally. I just don’t want him to be my senator.”






hope wrote on Oct 30, 2008 5:49 PM: